Chicken Pox Varicella-Zoster- Its Epidemiology - 1428 Words

Chicken Pox: Varicella-Zoster- Its Epidemiology Grand Canyon University A communicable disease that affects any age group is Varicella, or more commonly known as Chicken Pox. This contagious disease is caused by the Varicella-Zoster Virus. A person who has not had the virus, or has been vaccinated with chicken pox can get the disease. Symptoms of chicken pox include high fever, tiredness, loss of appetite, and headaches. Chicken pox causes fluid filled blisters that show up on the face, chest and back, then spreading onto the rest of the body. The fluid filled blisters eventually turns into scabs as the disease progresses. A person who received the chicken pox vaccine can get the virus, but with a mild case of the symptoms such as a†¦show more content†¦If the patient is on an air borne or droplet precautions, masks are to worn by staff and visitors. Finally, and the most important thing, is proper hygiene, such as washing hands before and after care for the patients and attending to their area. Within the household, it is necessary for t hose that would have a higher risk of complications from the virus to not come in contact with those that have been infected. With the proper health resources, knowledge on how to control the infection from spread is as important as tackling the virus itself. The epidemiologic triangle of Chicken pox includes the Virus as its agent. This virus is called the Varicella-Zoster virus. As any virus, it cannot live or grow on its own, therefore it infects other viable cells in the body, therefore becoming contagious. The second vertices, the host, of chicken pox would be the infected human. A person would not initially know they have been infected with the virus through its initial symptoms, as the more physical and notifiable symptoms of chickens pox, the blisters, do not show until 1 to 2 days after becoming infected. The third point of the epidemiologic is its environment. The virus is favorable of growing in crowded environment, such as when school children pass germs to one another w henShow MoreRelatedCommunicable Diseases : Communicable Disease1318 Words   |  6 Pagesof transmission e.g direct and indirect Portal of entry e.g respiratory, gastrointestinal and blood Susceptible host can be an individual whose immune system is low. Chicken pox (Varicella) is one of the very contagious communicable diseases. A lot of changes has been seen in the epidemiology of chicken pox since the introduction of the vaccine in 1995. In America, the incidence, complications, hospital admissions, and deaths in children and in the general population, has been reducedRead MoreChicken Pox1457 Words   |  6 PagesChicken Pox - Epidemiology Paper By Brett Birkeland Grand Canyon University NRS-427V July 29, 2015 Chicken Pox - Epidemiology Paper In this paper, the nurse author will discuss the communicable disease called Varicella, also known as chicken pox. The nurse author will discuss the causes, symptoms, and mode of transmission, complications, and treatment, as well as mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence of the disease. The determinants of health will be described, and the factorsRead MoreChicken Pox1511 Words   |  7 PagesChickenpox Epidemiology Grand Canyon University: NRS-427V June 7, 2014 Chickenpox is disease caused by the virus varicella-zoster. It is most common in children under the age of fifteen but still possible for older children and adults to obtain. Chickenpox appears as an itchy red rash all over the body, the rash can turn into fluid filled blisters other symptoms include, fevers, headaches, tiredness, and loss of appetite. Chickenpox is very contagious and can be spread even when there areRead MoreEpidemiology-Chickenpox1582 Words   |  7 PagesEpidemiology Paper- Chicken Pox Grand Canyon University Community/Public Health Nursing NRS-427V August 8, 2015 Chicken Pox or Varicella is a highly contagious viral disease caused by the Varicella-Zoster virus that causes a blister like itchy rash all over the body. The rash is the disclosing indication of chicken pox (Mayo Clinic 2015). While signs and symptoms of chicken pox will usually appear one to two days prior to the rash, the rash itself will last from five to ten days. The symptomsRead MoreEpidemiology of Chickenpox1614 Words   |  7 PagesEpidemiology of Chickenpox Karissa N. Martinez Grand Canyon University: NRS-427V 05/16/2014 Epidemiology of Chickenpox This essay was written to explain the epidemiology of chickenpox and allow the reader to develop a better understanding of the disease. The author intended for the reader to become informed about the causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment and mortality and morbidity rates. Also, the reader will become familiar with the determinants of healthRead MoreCommunicable Disease Is A Contagious Disease Essay1493 Words   |  6 Pagesexposed to a multiple of different bugs. Within this paper, the focus will be on Varicella (aka Chickenpox). Varicella is a contagious disease caused by the highly contagious infection, varicella-zoster virus (VZV). (Pergam Limaye, 2009) Through understanding the pathophysiology, it allows health care providers to comprehend better the agent, host, and environment where it is more prevalent. The varicella-zoster virus (VZV) enters the human body through the respiratory system by either directRead MoreChickenpox1894 Words   |  8 Pag esEpidemiology: Chickenpox The Varicella-Zoster virus causes a very infectious disease called Chickenpox. Chickenpox is usually acquired through the inhalation of airborne respiratory droplets from an infected host. Chickenpox is primarily acquired during childhood , with more than 90% of all reported cases occurring in children under the age of 10. A person with chickenpox can spread the virus without even showing any signs or symptoms. It is usually most easily transmitted two to three days beforeRead MoreChickenPox Essay1408 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ Chicken Pox and Epidemiology Sylvia Hoffman Grand Canyon University Chicken Pox and Epidemiology Chicken Pox is a virus caused by varicella-zoster, a member of the herpes family. This same virus also is a cause of herpes zoster other known as shingles in adults. Chicken pox is very contagious and can easily spread to people. Chicken pox is acquired by coming into contact with the fluid of a chicken pox blister, or airborne by an infected person sneezing near you. The blister-like rashRead MoreChicken Pox2383 Words   |  10 PagesCourse Title: Epidemiology Lecturer: Mrs. Marilyn Procope-Beckles Group Members: Khadisha Daniel Vernella Joefield Nathalie Mohammed Rania Gardiner Stacey John Denise Lashley-Agard Britney Dumas Natalia Roberts [pic] Table of Content Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.Page 3 Signs and Symptoms†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...PageRead MoreChickenpox683 Words   |  3 PagesChickenpox along the Way By Vonsha Farnum Kaplan University Professor Danial Gilmore HS311-01: Epidemiology and Biostatistics I Chickenpox along the Way Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease caused by the varicella-zoster virus. Chickenpox being relatively a mild disease derived from chicken peas or the idea that the disease originated from chickens. Occurring in all parts of the world. Chickenpox was thought to be a form of smallpox until the late 19th century and

Nature vs Nurture Genes vs Environment Essay example

Throughout the history of human existence, there have always been many questions that have plagued man for centuries. Some of these questions are â€Å"what is the meaning of life† or â€Å"which came first, the chicken or the egg.† Within the last 400 years a new question has surfaced and has caused an enormous controversy which takes our minds to much further levels. The controversy is whether inherited genes or the environment influences and affects our personality, intelligence, behavior, development and abilities. This controversy is most often recognized as the â€Å"Nature vs. Nurture† conflict. Some people believe that it is strictly genes that affect our ways of live and how we are, while others believe that it is the environment that affects†¦show more content†¦For example, with little kids, they mimic what adults do, they try to be like them. Your friends/peers impact your life as well. Maybe they smoke and just to get accepted or to feel tha t you belong then you start smoking as well. People could influence how you act Genie is an example that experiences are more powerful to determine a person’s life. She had been strapped to a potty chair until the age of thirteen when she was discovered by the police. Her parents, the mother who was partially blind, and the father, who was mentally retarded, ruined the majority of her life. She grew in terrible conditions and she did not have the affection that a child is suppose to get when they are growing up. She did not know how to speak and she could walk only a little bit. The conditions and the environment she lived in affected her life. Scientists tried to teach her how to speak but she could not learn anymore, they said that the time for learning had already passed. If her environment would have been different maybe she would have been a healthy girl. Scientists often use twins to conduct their experiments. They separated many twins at birth and placed them into two totally different environments. One was given to a very poor family and the other one was given to a rich family. The twin that lived with the poor family did not get much attention when he was growing up and he grew up to be a distantShow MoreRelatedNature vs Nurture: Genes vs Environment1174 Words   |  5 Pagesquote remains a mystery. Appearance is in nature and character is nurtured. Which one is more dominant on the other is a question waiting to be answered. The widely explored nature vs. nurture debate is best examined by looking at, hereditary implications, environmental factors and their interdependency. Hereditary factors play an integral part in developing persons’ physical traits, emotional traits and social etiquettes. The nature/nurture debate will be explored further using theseRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Genes vs Environment Essay995 Words   |  4 PagesIn trying to understand human behavior, professionals for centuries have looked at the nature vs. nurture theory. While it is known that the physical traits such of eye or hair color have to do with nature, some strongly believe that genes play a part in the way we behave such as in personality and intelligence and others believe that we behave a certain way solely due to our environment. Professor Jerome Kagan, from Harvard opened up a brand new world and offers a deeper understanding for theRead More Nature vs Nurture: Genes vs Environment Essay1490 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction A debate between psychologist, scientists and philosopher thinkers on the spectrum of ‘nature vs. nurture’ arose concerning human development. In the nature versus nurture debate, the term nature refers to the genes we inherit while the term nurture refers to our outside environment (Nature vs. Nurture: Twin and Adoption Studies). This debate of ‘nature vs. nurture’ has existed for centuries and up to now it is still a topic of major discussion although at present time. Human developmentRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Genes vs Environment Essay1285 Words   |  6 Pagesgender identity develops, through the conditioning of our environments. The most influential factor of gender development, however, is still a very controversial issue. An analysis of the gender identification process reveals two main arguments in what factor most greatly contributes to gender development: biology differences (nature) or the environment (nurture). The first main factor that is said to influence gender is biology. â€Å"Nature doesn’t give a flea’s hind leg for our social theories, fadsRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay1300 Words   |  6 PagesNature versus nurture has emerged as one of the most heated debates in the 21st century. It is more aligned towards the internal and external factors that comprise human beings behavior. The internal factors are innate and perceived to be genetically revolved as opposed to the external factors that are influenced by the environment and individuals’ experiences. However, scholars in different fields have researched on the relationship between nature and nurture without due success and this has createdRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay936 Words   |  4 Pagesour genes, our environment, or in the way we are raised? For years, there has been an on-going debate between nature and nurture. T.H. Whi te, author of The Once and Future King, explores the debate through many of the book’s characters. The issue clearly appears in the relationship of Queen Morgause and her sons, the Orkney brothers. The debate caused people to pick a side, to pick nature over nurture, or nurture over nature. However, it does not have to be one or the other. Nature and nurture workRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay example997 Words   |  4 Pagesan attempt to understand human behavior, professionals for centuries have looked at the nature vs. nurture theory. While it is known that the physical traits such of eye or hair color have to do with nature, some strongly believe that the way people behave such as in personality and intelligence, have to do with genetic makeup and some believe that people behave a certain way solely due to their environment. Professor Jerome Kagan, from Harvard opened up a brand new world and offers hope for thoseRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay778 Words   |  4 Pagesto our environment and surroundings. We have all tried to hide our true personality in order to be accepted, and have imitated other people. A person’s personality changes as they are exposed to different situations. Since the person changed, one will find a new way to deal with different situations. After, they might influence their friends to change as well. However, the changes could be on the good side or the bad side. This is how nurture changes us over time. Nurture is the environment that weRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay1037 Words   |  5 Pageswill be forever or if the society they grow in creates all of their attributes. This nature versus nurture debate affects many aspects of life, including the treatment of serial killers and psychopaths, and recognition of emotional and mental disorders, the acceptance of homosexuality, and even video game regulation. The nature theory states that only a person’s genes develop their personality, while the nurture theory states that personality is developed only because of the impact of societyRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay566 Words   |  3 Pagesovercame my shyness and I changed into an outgoing person. As many people have begun to pay attention to formation of personality, the debate over nature vs. nurture has raged for a long time and this issue is still controversial. However, as shown the experience above, I believe that people’s personalities are determined by their environment rather than by their genetics for the following reasons. One reason is that people’s personalities are not eternal and their personalities constantly change

Hamlet On TV Essay Example For Students

Hamlet On TV Essay Hamlet has been produced in a variety of ways, but making a movie out of Hamletis very different. When producing Hamlet on film there are some liberties thatare taken for either artistic benefit or to keep it shorter. These liberties areup to the directors interpretation of Hamlet. The directorsinterpretations make each Hamlet production different. Unique differences makeeach Hamlet interesting. When I watch a production of Hamlet I find myselflooking at the dialogue. I try to remember how Shakespeare wrote it and thencompare it to how the actors are performing it. The dialogue in Hamlet is keyand the success of a production depends on having it performed successfully. Inthe Mel Gibson production they add a lot to the dialogue especially in thebeginning. The film begins at the funeral of King Hamlet rather than on thewatch with Marcellus and Bernardo. The Mel Gibson version also takes a lot ofdialogue out of Hamlet including the whole idea of Fortinbras. He is not in the1990 production so that it is shorter. As for the 1964 version where AnthonyHopkins plays Claudius, the dialogue is almost exactly the way Shakespeare wroteit. In the Laurence Olivier version the dialogue is very near the original. Theproduction is artistically narrated rather than all being said aloud. I thinkthis production was very interesting and provides more explanation of Hamlet asyou hear some of his great speeches as his thoughts rather than speech. The 1948and the 1964 production were very near the actual dialogue while the 1990version with Gibson had several differences. All three were very good but thedialogue in the Laurence Olivier production was much better. Character portrayalcan make one Hamlet production better than another. In the Mel Gibson version ofHamlet Laertes seems like he is weak. The actor playing him did not have acommanding presence and he had a soft voice. However, the Laertes in the 1964production was strong and kept a demeanor that commanded respect. The Laertes inthe early production in 1948 was not all that prominent in the first scenes butat the end he became a big part of the play like he should. As for Hamlet,Laurence Olivier was the best Hamlet. He caught the concept well and performedit marvelously. I did enjoy the Hamlet Mel Gibson played well because when heinsults the king the insults seem more pronounced and easy to understand. MelGibsons played the insane part of Hamlet well too. I think this is the bestpart of his character. His face and understanding of the text made it seem morerealistic than when I read it. The Hamlet in the 1964 production was plain; hedid not have any uniqueness but did play the part well. All three Poloniuses inthese productions played well as they supported the role of the king. ThePolonius in the Gibson version though did an extremely good performance. Hispronunciation of the text and his facial expression as well as his body languagewas absolutely marvelous. By far Glenn Close played the best queen she playedthe innocent part well. She was playful at the beginning and her characterdegenerated to the sad ending. She did everything right; the facial expressions,the body language, the text; she did it all well. The casts of all the filmswere great. The cast of Gibson was grand and Oliviers cast was good as well,but the cast in which Anthony Hopkins played in 1964 was the best. They fittogether well and complimented each other. The character portrayal in Gibsonsversion was fun while the portrayal of characters in the Laurence Olivierproduction was great. All three productions were very enjoyable though. .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 , .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .postImageUrl , .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 , .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:hover , .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:visited , .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:active { border:0!important; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:active , .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862 .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ue2f59d096ff15ef5567aea9ec9586862:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Gandhi Essay Whenmaking a movie out of a play the director has to worry about keeping itenjoyable for the audience, therefore he might want to make it shorter. TheGibson version is obvious of this as it starts with a scene Shakespeare neverwrote. It started with the funeral of the dead king. They also added a marriagecelebration scene. These two scenes help people who have not studied the text tounderstand what has happened in the play. To put these two scenes in they tookout Act 1 Scene 1 from the original text. The Gibson version also took out muchof the middle scenes but it still was enjoyable. The Laurence Olivier versionused narration to make the scene seem like he was thinking and we could hear histhoughts. It allowed him to use his face to express a whole lot more since hewas not talking as the speeches were read. The 1964 version kept pretty close tothe scenes but changed a little. The ghost scenes did not actually show a ghost,not even when Hamlet met with it. They shined a light on the faces of the actorsto make it seem like a ghost had shown up of camera. It was artistic, but Iprefer to see the ghost. The scene changes in all three were good and did notchange the play enough to be something other than Shakespeares Hamlet. Allthree version of Hamlet that I watched were interesting. Overall I enjoyed theMel Gibson version the best. It had the best sets; it was a castle. One of myfavorite actors is Mel Gibson so I was anxious to see how well he would do asHamlet. The costumes in the play were very nice and were used as and artistictool to show that Hamlet was mad. The queen was excellent and very enjoyable towatch. I like this Polonius best of all because he seemed so concerned withstanding in the court that he showed little care for his Ophelia. The Hamletthat Laurence Olivier played was excellent to the end. When I read the book Iimagined Hamlet being just like he played him. The use of dark scenery in thisversion did well to express the depressing mood of Hamlet and the entire stateof Denmark. The character interaction was great, as it was less obvious in thisversion that they were scripted lines. These old fashion actors produced a goodold fashion quality. The 1964 version was decent. I liked how loud and it seemedalmost boisterous Anthony Hopkins played Cluadius. It used the same dark effectsthat the 1948 production used, but it was also in color; that is always a goodthing. A lot was different in the forty year that was between the productions ofthese Hamlets. They were enjoyable and showed me how Hamlet can be interpreteddifferently.

Macbeth(c.1607), written by William Shakespeare, i Essay Example For Students

Macbeth(c.1607), written by William Shakespeare, i Essay s the tragic tale of Macbeth, a virtuous man, corrupted by power and greed. This tagedy could in fact be called A Tale of Two Theories. One theory suggests that the tragic hero, Macbeth, is led down an unescapable road of doom by an outside force, namely fate in the form of the three witches. The second suggests that there is no supernatural force working against Macbeth, which therefore makes him responsible for his own actions and inevitable downfall. It must be remembered that Macbethis a literary work of art, and as a peice of art is open to many different interpretations, none of them right and none of them wrong. But the text of the play seems to imply that Macbeth is indeed responsible for his own actions which are provoked by an unwillingness to listen to his own conscience, the witches, and his ambition. First, Macbeth ignores the voice of his own psyche. He knows what he is doing is wrong even before he murders Duncan, but he allows Lady Macbeth and greed to cloud his judgement. In referring to the idea of the murder of Duncan, Macbeth first states,We will proceed no further in this business(I.vii.32). Yet, after speaking with Lady Macbeth he recants and proclaims,I am settled, and bend up/Each corporal agent to this terrible feat(I.vii.79-80). There is nothing supernatural to be found in a man being swayed by the woman he loves, as a matter of fact this action could be perceived as quite the opposite. Second, the witches have to be dispelled as a source of Macbeths misfortune before the latter theory can be considered. It is admittedly strange that the weird sisters first address Macbeth with,All hail, Macbeth! hail to thee Thane of Cawdor!(I.iii.49), a title which not even Macbeth is aware he has been awarded. Even stranger is the third witch calling to Macbeth,All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter!(I.iii.50). However as stated by Bradley,No connection of these announcements with any actions of his was even hinted by the withches(232). Some are still not convinced though of the witches less than supernatural role; nevertheless, Macbeth appears throughout the play to be completely aware 3 of his actions, as opposed to being contolled by some mystic force. The effect of the witches on the action of the play is best summarized by these words: while the influences of the Witches prophecies on Macbeth is very great, it is quite clearly shown to be an influnce and nothing more.(Bradley 232) Most important to the theory that Macbeth is reponsible for his own actions would be a point that the infamous witches and Macbeth agree upon. Such an element exists in the form of Macbeths ambiton. In the soliloquy Macbeth gives before he murders Duncan, he states, . ..I have no spur/To prick the sides of intent, but only/Vaulting ambition,.. .(I.vii.25-27). Are these the words of a man who is merely being led down a self dustructive path of doom, with no will of his own? Or are they the words of a man who realizes not only the graveness of his actions, but, also the reasons behind them? The answer is clear, Macbeth is a totally cognizant principal and not a mindless puppet. Later the head witch, Hecate, declares,Hath been but for a wayward son,/Spiteful and wrathful, who, as others do,/Loves for his own ends, not for you. (III.v. 11-13), which again highlights Macbeths ambitious nature. The most significant part of the play is the part that is missing, and that is a conn!ection between Macbeths ambition and some spell cast by the weird sisters which might be said to magically cause an increase in his desires. While purposely played in a mysterious setting, the location is not meant to cloud the true theme of the play with the supernatural. Macbeth simply succumbs to natural urges which take him to a fate of his own making. .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a , .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .postImageUrl , .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a , .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:hover , .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:visited , .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:active { border:0!important; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:active , .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u81d239a5c4d5edb745d06cbd9278a77a:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Computer Mouse Essay Everyone has character flaws that he must live with; Macbeth simply allowed those flaws to destroy him. 3 Works Cited Bradley, A.C. The Witch Scenes in Macbeth. England in Literature. Ed. John Pfordesher, Gladys V. Veidemanis, and Helen McDonnell. Illinois: Scott, Foresman, 1989. 232-233 Shekespeare, William. Macbeth. England in Literature. Ed. John Pfordesher, Gladys V. Veidemanis, and Helen McDonnell. Illinois: Scott, Foresman, 1989. 191-262